Archive for the Uncategorized Category

The Problem With ‘Racism’

Posted in Uncategorized on February 21, 2012 by English National Resistance - North West

Right, the starting place for any serious look at the word and concept ‘racism’ has to be loaded language. Why is that? Because ‘racism’ is a carefully and deliberately designed piece of such language.

So what is loaded language? Loaded language is language which attempts to persuade by appealing to your emotions. ‘Racist’ is very likely the preeminent example of such a word in modern discourse. ‘Fascist’/’Nazi’/’anti-Semite’/’White supremacist’, etc. are others that modern ethno-nationalists of European descent will be all too familiar with.

So how does it actually work? That’s simple. Human beings are adept at learning. One way we learn is through conditioning – when two stimuli are experienced together repeatedly, we learn to unconsciously associate them with one another, so that experiencing one on its own triggers the other. This goes with language, whereby we learn to associate particular things with particular sounds, so that the sound itself comes to trigger in us the memory or sensation of the thing it’s paired with. But words don’t just have explicit meanings – they also have connotations (including very strong emotional responses!) And so it’s very easy to see how this can be and is routinely used in propaganda to influence you at the pre-rational level. All the Cultural Marxists need to do is to repetitively associate a word like ‘racism’ with an extremely negative emotional response (by, for example, constantly using the word ‘racism‘whilst describing genocide, ethnic cleansing, racially motivated violence, etc.) and then constantly use the same word – ‘racism’ – to describe tangentially related phenomena which the Cultural Marxist wishes to stigmatise (e.g. ethnic pride or loyalty on the part of European descended people). In this way it’s possible to transfer the understandably negative reaction we have towards genocide over to perfectly innocuous (and perfectly necessary!) things such as looking out for one’s ethnic interests if you’re of European descent. Et voilà! The Cultural Marxist has got people running scared from the very intellectual positions they most need if they’re going to defend themselves against ethnic displacement (or worse…)

As for the word itself, ‘racism’ is deliberately misleading and its purpose is to confuse two quite distinct phenomena:

  1. Actively doing harm to somebody because of their race, and
  2. Merely refraining from doing good to somebody because of their race.

Only the former is considered wrong for non-Whites, but both are considered wrong when it comes to Whites. And that really is the whole point of the term ‘racism’; it serves to convince White people that they are under a moral obligation to let non-Whites into their countries, give them a portion of their wealth, provide services for them and get nothing in return, etc.

It’s also dubious from the point of view that ‘racism’ – in the sense of actively harming someone because of their race – is wrong because it involves harming somebody for no good reason; not because somebody has been treated differently because of their race – which is something people do all the time, much like we treat people differently according to their gender or their age, for example. Clearly, Cultural Marxism is complete and utter nonsense to anyone with at least a single brain cell on active duty.

And that’s the crux of it: our continuing inability to differentiate different forms of ethnic and racial discrimination enables the Left to carry out its long-lived campaign to systematically distort language and its accompanying meaning, specifically in order to stigmatise any sense of ethnic loyalty or kinship on the part of European descended peoples. It also leads to such inanities as Whites who claim a preference for the company of members of their own group(s) being met with cries of “racial hatred” (?!?)

In conclusion, it must be said: it’s imperative for those us concerned with ethnic survival, as well as the survival of our very civilisation, that we systematically deconstruct and destroy such malignant, Cultural Marxist newspeak.

The 5 Switches of Manliness: Nature

Posted in Uncategorized on February 21, 2012 by English National Resistance - North West


A quick detour from the usual politicking:


In this Switches of Manliness series, we’ve been talking about those unique parts of a man’s psyche that have fallen into disuse in the modern world and need to be reactivated. But there’s likely some overlap between the needs of men and the needs of women; for example, primitive women used to be quite physical too, and I think modern women need to have an element of physicality in their lives as well. But with this switch, there’s definitely more than a little overlap. The Switch of Nature is for everyone. Men. Women. Children. Squirrels. Well, I think squirrels have it down pretty well. But it’s for everyone and their mom. Literally—your mom needs it too.


Man’s Separation from Nature: The Third “Frontier”

With the rest of the switches, there was a good amount of theorizing going on as we looked back in time and tried to uncover the life and perspective of primitive man. But with this switch, we don’t have to speculate—we can say this with 100% certitude: primitive man spent a lot more time outside in nature than modern man does. Primitive people were surrounded by nature all day, every day. Their lives revolved around it: they supped from it; they created with it; they protected themselves from it; they even worshiped it.


Read the rest of it at the following. Enjoy!

The 5 Switches of Manliness: Nature

Bourgeois Liberalism as Moral Fraud

Posted in Uncategorized on February 21, 2012 by English National Resistance - North West

One of the main reasons liberals want to give away their country to others is because they feel it makes them look good in the eyes of others – that it makes them appear supremely generous and altruistic.

The problem here, of course, is that what they’re giving to others (their country) is not actually theirs to give away. It not only belongs to the nation as a whole – the majority of whom don’t actually want to lose their lands – but also to their ancestors and descendants.

I’m sorry, but our ancestors did not bleed and die on battlefields defending their country just so a small segment of the current population could throw it away in order to bump themselves up the social ladder according to the bourgeois fashions of the day.

What exactly do they think will come of our descendants? What kind of a world will they be brought up in? What are they going to think, coming into a world where nobody trusts anybody else, to give just one example? And let’s get this straight; ethnic diversity doesn’t merely cause lower trust between different ethnic groups but lower trust and bonding between individuals of the same ethnic group i.e. all people slowly withdraw into themselves, not feeling any sense of connection to the wider community. In short: alienation.

So, as is now apparent, what liberals are in fact doing – by seeking the benefits of altruism in giving away the inheritance of others – is committing an act of moral fraud. Nobody under any circumstances should let these people take a solitary inch of the moral high ground. For that belongs to them neither.